A Regret Theory and Frank Aggregation Operator-Based Spherical Cubic Fuzzy CoCoSo Decision Method
Keywords:
Spherical cubic fuzzy set, Frank t-norm and s-norm, LOPCOW, CoCoSoAbstract
As an extension of spherical fuzzy sets, spherical cubic fuzzy (SCF) sets can more effectively handle uncertain data represented by cubic fuzzy numbers. Nevertheless, existing research on SCF sets is primarily focused on algebraic operations and rarely considers the psychological behavior of experts in decision-making. To address these limitations, this study proposes a novel decision-making method based on Frank aggregation operators and a regret theory-based Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) model in a spherical cubic fuzzy environment. Specifically, SCF sets are used to represent uncertain preference information by combining the advantages of spherical fuzzy sets and cubic sets. We then define new SCF operations based on Frank norms and propose four SCF aggregation operators to obtain collective assessments from multiple experts. Subsequently, the criteria weights are determined using an enhanced logarithmic percentage change-driven objective weighting (LOPCOW) method incorporating the SCF score function. To rank the alternatives while considering the psychological behavior of decision-makers, we develop an improved CoCoSo model by integrating regret theory with the proposed SCF aggregation operators. The proposed decision-making method is applied to the diagnosis of patients with cardiovascular disease under uncertainty. Sensitivity and comparative analyses are conducted to evaluate the robustness and effectiveness of the proposed regret theory-based spherical cubic fuzzy CoCoSo decision-making method.
Downloads
References
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
Yager, R. R. (2014). Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(4), 958–965. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989
Yager, R. R. (2017). Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 25(5), 1222–1230. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2604005
Cuong, B. C. (2014). Picture fuzzy sets. Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics, 30(4), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.15625/1813-9663/30/4/5032
Rong, Y., Yu, L., Niu, W., Liu, Y., Senapati, T., & Mishra, A. R. (2022). MARCOS approach based upon cubic Fermatean fuzzy set and its application in evaluation and selecting cold chain logistics distribution center. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 116, 105401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105401
Rong, Y., Yu, L., Liu, Y., Simic, V., & Pamucar, D. (2024). A pharmaceutical cold-chain logistics service quality model using a q-rung orthopair fuzzy framework with distance measure. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 136, 109019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109019
Rong, Y., Yu, L., Liu, Y., Peng, X., & Garg, H. (2024). An integrated group decision-making framework for assessing S3PRLPs based on MULTIMOORA-WASPAS with q-rung orthopair fuzzy information. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10782-7
Ayaz, T., Al-Shomrani, M. M., Abdullah, S., & Hussain, A. (2020). Evaluation of enterprise production based on spherical cubic Hamacher aggregation operators. Mathematics, 8(10), 1761. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8101761
Ali, G., Nabeel, M., & Farooq, A. (2024). Extended ELECTRE method for multi-criteria group decision-making with spherical cubic fuzzy sets. Knowledge and Information Systems, 66(10), 6269–6306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-024-02132-4
Mohammed, M. T., Shubber, M. S., Qahtan, S., Alsatta, H. A., Mourad, N., Zaidan, A. A., & Zaidan, B. B. (2025). Determining the superiority of a robust cloud fault tolerance mechanism using a spherical cubic fuzzy set-based decision approach. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 148, 110402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110402
Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
Mardani, A., Nilashi, M., Zakuan, N., Loganathan, N., Soheilirad, S., Saman, M. Z. M., & Ibrahim, O. (2017). A systematic review and meta-analysis of SWARA and WASPAS methods: Theory and applications with recent fuzzy developments. Applied Soft Computing, 57, 265–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.03.045
Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Vilutiene, T. (2010). Multiple criteria analysis of foundation instalment alternatives by applying Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 10(3), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1644-9665(12)60141-1
Guo, F., Gao, J., Liu, H., & He, P. (2021). Locations appraisal framework for floating photovoltaic power plants based on relative-entropy measure and improved hesitant fuzzy linguistic DEMATEL-PROMETHEE method. Ocean & Coastal Management, 215, 105948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105948
Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2019). A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management Decision, 57(9), 2501–2519. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2017-0458
Ecer, F., & Pamucar, D. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection: A novel integrated fuzzy best worst method (F-BWM) and fuzzy CoCoSo with Bonferroni (CoCoSo'B) multi-criteria model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, 121981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121981
Peng, X., & Luo, Z. (2021). Decision-making model for China's stock market bubble warning: The CoCoSo with picture fuzzy information. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54(8), 5675–5697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-09954-6
Pamucar, D., & Gorcun, O. F. (2022). Evaluation of the European container ports using a new hybrid fuzzy LBWA-CoCoSo'B techniques. Expert Systems with Applications, 203, 117463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117463
Wang, H., Mahmood, T., & Ullah, K. (2023). Improved CoCoSo method based on Frank softmax aggregation operators for T-spherical fuzzy multiple attribute group decision-making. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 25(3), 1275–1310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-022-01442-5
Rong, Y., & Yu, L. (2023). Decision support system for prioritization of offshore wind farm site by utilizing picture fuzzy combined compromise solution group decision method. Entropy, 25(7), 1081. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25071081
Yu, L., Kang, X., & Qiu, R. (2025). Unlocking corporate green governance capabilities in China: A supply chain-oriented evaluation based on an improved FBWM-CoCoSo method. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 16(4), 897–920. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2025.8.010
Khan, A., Barukab, O., Jun, Y. B., Khan, S. A., Ahmad, U., & Rushdi, A. M. A. (2025). An extended CoCoSo method under (p-q) rung orthopair fuzzy environment for multi-criteria decision-making applications. Scientific Reports, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-06020-x
Zhang, H., & Wei, G. (2023). Location selection of electric vehicles charging stations by using the spherical fuzzy CPT-CoCoSo and D-CRITIC method. Computational & Applied Mathematics, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-022-02183-9
Fan, J., Duan, Y., & Wu, M. (2025). A new approach to failure mode and effect analysis based on regret theory and group satisfaction index in basin-type insulators. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 152, 110729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110729
Jun, Y. B. (2017). A novel extension of cubic sets and its applications in BCK/BCI-algebras. Annals of Fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics, 14(5), 475–486. https://doi.org/10.30948/afmi.2017.14.5.475
Mahmood, T., Ullah, K., Khan, Q., & Jan, N. (2019). An approach toward decision-making and medical diagnosis problems using the concept of spherical fuzzy sets. Neural Computing & Applications, 31(11), 7041–7053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3521-2
Qin, J., Liu, X., & Pedrycz, W. (2016). Frank aggregation operators and their application to hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Applied Soft Computing, 41, 428–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.12.030
Li, D., Wan, G., & Rong, Y. (2026). An enhanced spherical cubic fuzzy WASPAS method and its application for the assessment of service quality of crowdsourcing logistics platform. Spectrum of Decision Making and Applications, 3(1), 100–123. https://doi.org/10.31181/sdmap31202641
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yuan Rong, Huiyi Qiu, Qian Zhang, Wenxue Zhang (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.